J.A. v. Mandy Associates: what the First Department held on lead causation

Frankel Law Firm

Since 1978 · Attorney Advertising

J.A. v. Mandy Associates: what the First Department held on lead causation

In J.A. v Mandy Associates LLC, the Bronx Supreme Court denied the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on liability and causation, and the Appellate Division, First Department unanimously affirmed that denial (84 Misc 3d 740 [2024], affd 237 AD3d 471 [1st Dept 2025]). This note states what those opinions print. It is not a recovery announcement and not a claim that the firm “won” Mandy.

Caption and posture

Trial: J.A. v. Mandy Assoc. LLC, 84 Misc. 3d 740, 216 N.Y.S.3d 494 (Sup. Ct. Bronx County July 11, 2024) (Hummel, J.) — denied plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on liability and causation.

Appeal: J.A. v. Mandy Assoc., LLC, 237 A.D.3d 471, 232 N.Y.S.3d 94, 2025 NY Slip Op 02035 (1st Dep’t Apr. 8, 2025) — unanimously affirmed.

Official Reports: 2024 NY Slip Op 24194 · 2025 NY Slip Op 02035.

Turnover noncompliance is not absolute liability

The courts rejected using Local Law 1’s turnover provision (Administrative Code §27-2056.8) as a private absolute or strict-liability path to summary judgment. A landlord’s turnover noncompliance may be some evidence of negligence, but it does not replace the common-law elements—including proximate cause—under Juarez v Wavecrest Management Team, 88 NY2d 628 (1996). The First Department held that, regardless of whether failure to comply with the turnover provision provided some evidence of negligence, triable issues of fact remained on whether lead exposure proximately caused the infant’s alleged injuries.

For how the firm discusses Juarez, notice, and negligence without absolute-liability theater, see landlord liability. Turnover duties in statute terms are on Local Law 1 and turnover provisions.

Proximate cause remained for the jury

The First Department centered the affirmance on proximate cause. Competing medical experts and school and IQ records created a jury question on whether exposure caused the claimed injuries. A conclusory expert assertion of “heme inhibition,” without a showing of physical symptoms or actual injury, was not enough to take causation from the jury or to win summary judgment. Elevated blood-lead figures recited in the trial court’s fact statement are case facts as the opinion prints them; they are not a finding of recoverable injury as a matter of law, and they are not a CDC “lawsuit trigger.”

This disposition is a denial of partial summary judgment, affirmed on appeal. It is not a plaintiff verdict, not a new absolute-liability rule, and not a settled recovery printed in these opinions.

Practice takeaway for families

Document symptoms and functional impairment carefully. Turnover gaps and Local Law 1 compliance records can matter as negligence evidence; they do not, alone, resolve liability or causation on papers. For the firm’s evergreen index of major New York lead decisions, see landmark cases — this post is a narrow Mandy 2024/2025 procedural note and does not retitle that library.

Counsel line (opened opinions)

The Frankel Law Firm appeared for the plaintiffs in the trial court and for the appellants on appeal, as the Official Reports counsel lines print. Those lines are counsel citations. They are not announced recoveries, and they are not a promise about another case. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Call The Frankel Law Firm at (212) 888-5100. There is no fee to speak with us or for us to evaluate your potential case.

Lead poisoning lawyer.

Related pages

Our attorneys

Michael Stewart Frankel
Reuven S. Frankel

Our offices

305 Broadway, 7th Floor
New York, NY 10007

1500 Astor Avenue, 2nd Floor
Bronx, NY 10469

A telephone call or online inquiry does not create an attorney-client relationship. The firm represents a client only if it agrees to do so. Please do not send medical records until representation has been agreed. Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Cite the Official Reports as they print.

We welcome your legal questions for topically relevant articles in the future. Feel free to compose a question – it may be addressed in future articles. Email Question

Free Case Evaluation

Fill Out The Form Below To Find Out If You Have A Case.

    Thank you for contacting us. One of our colleagues will get back to you shortly.

    Fill out the form below to find out if you have a case.