Lead Paint Manufacturers and the Legal Battle: A U.S. Overview

This article delves into the legal challenges and victories involving lead paint manufacturers in the United States, focusing on their responsibility and accountability for lead poisoning cases.

National Perspective on Lead Paint Manufacturers’ Liability:

• Prevalence of Lead Paint: An estimated 3 million tons of lead paint were used in pre-1980 U.S. housing (42 USC 4851(3)).
• California’s Landmark Settlement: In a significant case, former lead paint manufacturers settled for $305 million with California county and city governments, earmarked for mitigating lead hazards (Reuters article on the settlement).
• Wisconsin Ruling: In Burton v. American Cyanamid Co., 407 F. Supp. 3d 786 (ED Wis 2019), manufacturers were held liable under Wisconsin’s risk contribution theory for children’s injuries.

Challenges Faced by Litigants in New York:

• New York Courts’ Stance: The state’s courts have been resistant to holding lead paint manufacturers accountable.
• Rejected Legal Theories: In Brenner v. American Cyanamid Co., 263 A.D.2d 165 (4th Dep’t 1999), aff’d, 288 A.D.2d 869 (4th Dep’t 2001), New York courts dismissed the “market share” liability concept.
• Shifting Responsibility to Landlords: Smith v. 2328 University Ave. Corp., 52 A.D.3d 216 (1st Dep’t 2008), leave to appeal denied, 11 N.Y.3d 708 (2008), ruled that landlords were responsible for abating lead hazards, not the manufacturers.
• Lengthy NYC Litigation with No Success: A prolonged legal battle initiated by New York City against lead paint manufacturers ended without holding them accountable.

Conclusion: The legal landscape in the U.S. regarding lead paint manufacturers’ liability is varied. While some states like California and Wisconsin have successfully held manufacturers responsible for lead poisoning, New York’s legal system has been less receptive to such claims. This disparity highlights the ongoing challenge in holding lead paint manufacturers accountable for their role in one of the country’s most pressing public health issues.

We welcome your legal questions for topically relevant articles in the future. Feel free to compose a question – it may be addressed in future articles. Email Question